When choosing between several software solutions, you'll always go through the in-deep analysis of the advantages and downsides of each application. In the case of AlienValut's vs. QRadar SIEM options, this stage shouldn't be overlooked either.
Below we've covered the major pros and cons of both SIEM applications so you can better understand the potential of each and make the right choice for your enterprise.
Pros and Cons of AlienValut
Being mostly targeted at the mid-market segment, AlienValut occupies the leading position in widespread SIEM systems use today. It offers multiple platform editions (Essentials Standard and Premium) and excellent support service to better fit the end-client needs. Apart from the benefits mentioned above, this SIEM system features a functional Dashboard and Activity section, accurate asset monitoring, and informative alert details – all these features are continuously mentioned in nearly every customer review.
The probable drawback to consider before installing this solution is a comparatively slow process of implementation, which can impact the ROI. However, this is not a significant downside, as it mostly depends on the experience of your team, and if you have any troubles – professional customer support can provide the best assistance during the deployment and use stages.
Pros and Cons of QRadar
QRadar is one of the top-rated enterprise-wide solutions for SIEM that perfectly meets the expectations of small businesses. It provides the best assistance in customizing and building modular apps, accomplishing advanced use-cases, as well as identifying threats or vulnerabilities hiding in the system. QRadar is also pretty configurable and is widely known for the automatic tickets, intelligent grouping, and data presentation features.
However, getting to know this platform might be more challenging compared to AlienValut, especially for the users that are new to SIEM. Also, some users reported the insufficient technical support, onboarding of new log sources, and asset management areas as the most painful drawbacks of the QRadar platform.